| |
|
 |
|
| The
Social Composition of Panchayats |
|
| May
19th 2008, Jayati Ghosh |
|
It
is now taken for granted in different parts of India
that locally elected panchayats can be important instruments
for ensuring more effective delivery of different public
services and government programmes, as well as means
of social and political mobilisation for more democratic
outcomes. But even when the panchayati raj institutions
were given prominence two decades ago through the passing
of the 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendments, this
was not so obvious.
In fact, West Bengal was a pioneering state in this
regard, which set the agenda for the rest of the country.
The positive experience of West Bengal’s own panchayat
legislation and subsequent measures at decentralisation
of different powers was what set the tone for the attempts
elsewhere in the country.
However, there was one significant feature of West Bengal’s
experience that made the decentralisation process much
more democratic – the fact that it was preceded and
accompanied by significant land reforms. These increased
the power and status of previously marginalised and
oppressed groups, encouraged them to participate more
actively in gram sabhas and panchayats, and increased
their proportion in the elected representation.
It is this feature of decentralisation being associated
with progressive land reforms that has made West Bengal’s
positive experience much harder to replicate in other
states, with a few exceptions such as Kerala and Tripura,
since there have hardly been significant land reforms
in the rest of the country. But it is particularly important
because it prevents or reduces the possibility that
the panchayats get dominated by village elites, especially
large landlords, moneylenders and traders, and thereby
reinforce power equations that are already skewed against
the poor and socially marginalised groups.
Data on the current composition of panchayats indicate
that less well-off categories are more numerous in the
panchayat membership, and traditional elite groups are
hardly represented. Agriculturalists and household workers
dominate in terms of the major occupations, but agricultural
labour is also reasonably well represented even at the
panchayat samiti level. Teachers do have disproportionate
representation; however, landlords and those involved
in business, who tend to dominate in the panchayats
of most other states, are insignificant in number and
as a proportion of total panchayat members.
Related to this has been the different social composition
of panchayats in terms of caste categories, which is
also different in West Bengal compared to other states.
While data on occupational background of panchayat members
are not easily available for other states, we do have
some information on social background and gender for
other states, based on a study commissioned by the Ministry
of Rural Development of the Government of India. The
table presents the results, which refer to five states,
in comparison to data from West Bengal.
Table
>>
All The most striking feature to emerge from the table
is the much greater representation of SCs at all levels
of panchayats in West Bengal, compared to all the other
five states. This cannot only be explained by the greater
presence of SCs in the population of West Bengal (which
is quite high at 23 per cent). The share of SCs in total
population is just as high in Maharashtra yet SCs are
significantly less in proportion to total elected representatives.
Indeed, the representation of SCs in the panchayats
is well above their share of population in West Bengal.
The same is true of STs. The proportion of STs in total
elected panchayat membership in West Bengal may appear
to be small at 7.2 per cent, especially in relation
to the higher figures evident for tribal-dominated states
such as Chhattisgarh and Madhya Pradesh. But it is higher
than the share of STs in the total population of West
Bengal (5.5 per cent). It is also worth noting that
both SCs and STs have been relatively well represented
not only at Gram Panchayat level, but even at the higher
tiers of district government such as the Zilla Parishads.
Another significant aspect relates to the empowerment
of women through participation in panchayats. West Bengal
has had a history of substantial representation of women
in panchayats well before the 73rd and 74th Amendments
were passed by Parliament; in fact, more than one-third
of panchayat members have been women throughout the
1980s and 1990s. The table shows that this continues
and that the proportion of women panchayat members at
different levels is somewhat higher in West Bengal than
in four of the other states. Only Uttar Pradesh has
a slightly higher representation, but in that state
the evidence on actual empowerment of women as a result
of this is more mixed.
The participation of women, SCs and STs in panchayats
tends to have dynamic effects on the social and political
empowerment of these groups in general, and also has
been seen to have positive effects on the general functioning
and responsiveness of panchayats to people’s needs.
There is therefore enormous potential for progressive
social change in such a process. Indeed, there is also
need to ensure adequate representation from minority
communities such as Muslims, for which we do not have
the data at present to analyse the actual extent of
participation.
Panchayats in West Bengal are charged with a very wide
range of powers and responsibilities, and these duties
have been increasing over time. It is therefore very
important to ensure that panchayat members are provided
with the requisite facilities and enabled with administrative
and technical resources to carry out their many functions.
It is encouraging to note that the state government
has recently announced that for the newly elected panchayats
as of 26 June 2008, pradhans of the gram panchayats
will be declared as whole-time functionaries, and their
remuneration and honorarium will be revised accordingly.
This was a much-needed measure to enable proper functioning,
and along these lines other measures need to be taken
to provide sufficient administrative support to all
panchayat members. This is especially important for
elected representatives who come from weaker sections
and have less in the way of their own financial and
other resources.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|